I am not completely against the use of A.I. in my work or to be used within the artist industry. I find the use of AI to be beneficial in many ways. However, it is to be used with caution and within moderation. The purpose of enhancing a piece further with minimal use of AI is justifiable in my eyes. The blatant use of AI to generate something from nothing, with no creative manipulation or input other than prompt writing is not something I can acknowledge as true "Art". 

If I am to use AI for generative imagery in any of my work it will be explicitly stated within the notes or description of said piece. 

I believe that integration of AI can have its place in the world, and as of writing this, it does. It must be viewed as a case study per instance. If a majority of the final deliverable was created with the use of generative code and AI, then it is a hard discussion on whether there was much creativity at all behind it.

The power to adapt our workflow with code and AI to make the general working world a much more efficient and predictable place has its benefits, but to call "AI Art" original is a slap in the face of designers and those who harbor genuine creativity. The human brain is a beautiful thing, we have the power to travel among the stars, communicate with each and everyone we meet, and create work that purposely transcends time itself. AI creates because it was told to.

I create because I want to.